top of page

The Merchants and Their Usurpation of Christian Monarchs

  • Writer: Sean Goins
    Sean Goins
  • 2 days ago
  • 24 min read

For over a thousand years, Western civilization rested on a sacred hierarchy. God ruled the heavens, and beneath Him, kings ruled nations by divine right. The Church sanctified law and life, and the nobility bore arms in defense of the realm. Society was not based on whims or wealth, but on order—an order built on land, blood, and eternal truth. The altar and the throne stood side by side, guardians of the people's soul. But there was one class that could not rise within this order. One class that chafed at every divine chain: the merchant.


The merchant was necessary, but never noble. He bought and sold. He loaned and demanded interest. He chased profit, not honor. The Church long warned against him. Saint Ambrose, Aquinas, and canon law all condemned usury. Dante placed the usurer in the seventh circle of Hell alongside the violent. The merchant was the only class that grew stronger by preying on the weakness of others. And he knew it. As he grew rich off wars and debts, he began to resent the king who commanded him, the priest who rebuked him, and the knight who would not bow to his coin.


By the late medieval period, merchant princes emerged—Medici bankers, Venetian financiers, Dutch traders. Their gold bought kings. Their fleets eclipsed armies. And soon, they began to write a new gospel: not the Gospel of Christ, but the gospel of capital. Liberty, equality, and reason became their holy trinity. The Enlightenment gave them philosophical cover, and revolution gave them the sword. From the English Civil War to the French Revolution, from the founding of the Bank of England to the creation of the First Republic in France, the merchant class struck with surgical precision—removing crowns, burning altars, and slaughtering those who stood in their way.


They did not want freedom. They wanted power without limits. And they knew they could never gain that power under a system where law came from God, and men were ranked by duty, not wealth. So they tore it down. They replaced kings with parliaments of their choosing, and replaced divine law with positive law that they could manipulate. They weakened the Church with secularism, mocked tradition with sophistry, and taught men to serve profit instead of principle. The merchant became the priest of a new paganism, and secular democracy became his temple.


The revolutions of the modern world were not organic uprisings of the people. They were orchestrated coups. The Christian order was betrayed not from below, but from within—by those who dressed in fine suits, quoted Rousseau, and carried ledgers instead of swords. And in the silence that followed, the merchant smiled. His age had begun.


The first great blow against Christian monarchy in the modern era came not from foreign invasion or pagan rebellion, but from within the heart of England itself. The English Civil War is remembered today as a battle between crown and Parliament, but this is a shallow reading. It was, in truth, a war between two worldviews. On one side stood Charles I, the sacred king, defender of divine order, the Church of England, and the traditional nobility. On the other side stood Parliament, bankrolled by the merchant elite of London, manipulated by radical Puritans, and driven by men who saw in revolution a path not to liberty, but to wealth and control.


Charles I held to the ancient belief in divine right. He ruled not by contract, but by command from Heaven. His crown was more than a symbol. It was a consecrated trust. The king’s duty was to protect the people, uphold the Church, and resist the encroachments of foreign powers and domestic usurers alike. He resisted attempts by Parliament to control royal finances, knowing that the true goal of his enemies was not constitutional reform, but the subjugation of the monarchy to the purse. In doing so, he signed his own death warrant.

The City of London, long jealous of the throne’s independence, allied itself with the revolutionary cause. Its gold funded the armies. Its pamphleteers poisoned the public mind. Its merchants saw in Parliament a government they could eventually dominate, and in Cromwell a weapon to wield against the sacred institutions of England. The Puritans were useful allies. Their religious fervor masked the deeper agenda. By encouraging sectarianism and rebellion, the unity of the Church was broken, and its moral authority shattered. In the name of religious freedom, the merchant class cleared the last moral obstacle to unfettered profit.


The war that followed was not a limited conflict. It was a total war of cultural destruction. Cathedrals were vandalized. Altars were smashed. The nobility was hunted, their lands confiscated and redistributed. And in 1649, the unthinkable happened. Charles I, sovereign of England by the grace of God, was dragged before a show trial and executed like a criminal. He went to his death with quiet dignity, not as a tyrant, but as a martyr for the old order. His murder was the first regicide in English history. It was not merely the death of a man. It was a public execution of divine hierarchy itself.


In his place rose Oliver Cromwell, a tyrant masquerading as a prophet. His rule was neither holy nor just. It was a military dictatorship enforced by Puritan fanaticism and the hidden hand of commerce. Cromwell claimed to be guided by Scripture, but his real apostles were taxmen, generals, and merchant bankers. He silenced bishops, dissolved Parliament when it no longer served him, and filled the land with informers, purges, and debt. He was not the Moses of a new promised land. He was the John the Baptist of a new world order—the herald of Mammon's reign.


Behind Cromwell’s sword stood the power of London’s counting houses. The men who had once been barred from the throne by their greed now ruled the kingdom in all but name. In their new order, there was no place for divine law. There was only statute and interest. The monarchy would be restored after Cromwell’s death, but it returned in chains. The Stuarts were allowed to reign only if they served Parliament. And Parliament was already in the pocket of the financiers who would soon give birth to the Bank of England.


With the king dead and the Church fractured, the merchant class had triumphed. The last defenses of Christendom within England had been breached. The sword had passed from the knight to the clerk. The kingdom became a ledger. The government no longer looked upward to God or backward to tradition. It looked only to the market. The English Civil War, therefore, must not be remembered as a fight for freedom. It was a coup. A sacred king was destroyed, not to free the people, but to enslave them to debt, bureaucracy, and commerce.

This was the prototype. This was the model that would be repeated in France, in Russia, and across the Western world. The merchant had tasted blood, and he would never be satisfied with silver again.


The so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 was not a triumph of liberty. It was a betrayal. A Dutch prince, William of Orange, was invited by England’s merchant elite to seize the throne from a rightful, anointed king. James II was driven from his realm not for crimes or tyranny, but for refusing to serve the financial interests of the rising commercial class. This was not a revolt of the people. It was a coup executed by the Whigs, sanctioned by Parliament, and backed by gold.


James II was a Catholic king, but more than that, he was a monarch who understood the sacred nature of rule. To him, the king was not a contract manager but a chosen vessel of divine authority. He stood against sectarian division and sought religious peace, but he refused to become the servant of Parliament. He resisted Whig control. He would not hand over the keys of the kingdom to the merchants of London. And for that, they replaced him.

William of Orange arrived on English soil not as a liberator, but as a foreign agent of commerce. He brought with him foreign troops, Dutch financiers, and English traitors. Under his reign, Parliament became supreme, not to protect liberty, but to secure control for the City of London. The Bank of England was founded in 1694, not by royal decree for the public good, but by private lenders to guarantee perpetual war finance. The crown became collateral. The nation became a debtor. The sword of justice was replaced with the bond of usury.


This was the formal enthronement of Mammon. From that moment forward, the English monarchy would serve the interests of finance, not of faith. The altar was pushed aside. The noble class was tamed. And the merchant sat atop the new order, cloaked in the respectability of parliamentary procedure.


But not all of Britain submitted. The Jacobite cause emerged as a flame of resistance. Loyal to the House of Stuart, faithful to the Church, and defenders of divine kingship, the Jacobites rose again and again to reclaim what had been stolen. Their uprisings were not rebellions. They were acts of remembrance. From the Scottish Highlands to the Irish countryside, from the loyal North of England to the hearts of Catholic peasants and Anglican traditionalists, men rose in defense of a sacred order that was being erased.


The Jacobites were not fighting for a flag. They were fighting for a worldview. They believed the monarchy was a holy covenant, not a legal abstraction. They marched for a society where law came from God, not bankers. Their leaders bore titles not bought with cash, but inherited through duty. Their warriors knelt in chapels before battle. Their loyalty was to king and Christ.

When Charles Edward Stuart, the Young Pretender, landed in Scotland in 1745, panic swept through the Whig establishment. But it was not the farmers or the working poor who funded the suppression of the Jacobites. It was the merchants of London. The financial elite poured gold into government coffers, buying war bonds and raising local militias to protect their banks, their property, and their fragile political order. The Bank of England, already a fortress of state debt and private profit, became the nerve center of the war effort. The merchants knew that if the Jacobites won, the old order would return, and with it, the supremacy of the altar and crown over the capital. So they paid to ensure the cause of God and king would die on the moor at Culloden.


The risings of 1689, 1715, and 1745 were fierce, passionate, and doomed. The final blow came at Culloden in 1746, where the Jacobite army was crushed on the moor by government forces armed, fed, and funded by the merchant state. But the defeat did not end at the battlefield. The British government launched a campaign of cultural extermination. Clan gatherings were outlawed. Tartan was banned. Gaelic speech was discouraged. Catholic chapels were desecrated. Priests were hunted. Bards were silenced. The Highlands were not just pacified. They were purified. The sword was not merely used to destroy bodies. It was used to erase memory.


The Bank of England stood triumphant. The merchant class had its empire. And William of Orange, known to some as King Billy, became a symbol not of freedom, but of conquest. His coronation was not a beginning, but an end. The end of Christian monarchy in Britain. The end of sacred kingship. The end of any serious opposition to the merchant’s rule. Parliament was now the visible mask. The banker was the hidden king.


But the Jacobite cause, though buried, remains a witness. It speaks to all who remember that a nation must be more than a market. It whispers of a time when loyalty was more than self-interest, when land meant more than capital, and when a king still knelt before God, not the banker. It was the last stand of the soul of Britain. And its fall cleared the way for the secular, usurious empire that would follow.


If the English Revolution was the banker’s first strike against Christendom, the French Revolution was his total war. It was not a spontaneous uprising of hungry peasants or enlightened reformers. It was a deliberate campaign to eradicate throne and altar from the soul of a nation. Behind the cries of liberty and equality stood a guillotine, and behind that guillotine stood the ledgers of merchants and the oaths of Freemasons.

By the late eighteenth century, France was one of the last remaining pillars of Christian monarchy in Europe. The king ruled by divine right. The nobility still held their titles through ancestral duty, not purchase. The Church owned land, fed the poor, housed orphans, and acted as a moral counterweight to corruption. France had sins, but it also had order. To the merchant class and their allies in the lodges, this was an unacceptable obstacle. They did not want reform. They wanted conquest.


The Freemasons prepared the ideological battlefield. Their lodges, filled with lawyers, merchants, and radicals, served as the incubators of rebellion. They preached the divinity of man and the superstition of Scripture. They called for brotherhood while plotting the ruin of priest and king. Robespierre, Danton, and Desmoulins were all sons of the lodge. Philippe Égalité, a royal cousin, was a high-ranking Mason who voted to execute King Louis. Jean-Baptiste Kléber, a general of the revolution, was another initiate. They worshipped reason, not revelation. They read Rousseau and Voltaire, not the Gospels. They believed not in the Kingdom of Heaven, but in the republic of man.


The press, funded by wealthy bourgeois families in Paris, flooded the streets with venom. They called the king a tyrant and the Church a parasite. They called tradition oppression and virtue ignorance. They did not speak for the poor. They spoke for the banker. They softened the people with slogans, then hardened their hearts with blood.

When the revolution came, it did not bring peace. It brought a new religion. The National Assembly declared that sovereignty came not from God but from the general will. The Church was nationalized. Monasteries were looted. Bishops were imprisoned. Priests were forced to swear oaths to a secular state. Those who refused were executed. Those who resisted were exterminated.


In the Vendée, Catholic peasants rose up not for gold or glory, but for the Mass, the priest, and the king. They stitched the Sacred Heart onto their banners. They sang hymns as they marched. They fought to protect their parishes, their families, and the old ways. The French Republic responded with fire and slaughter. Entire villages were razed. Women and children were thrown into rivers. The Loire ran red. The government called it pacification. History calls it genocide.


Even time was made a casualty of the revolution. The calendar of the Church was abolished. The Sabbath was erased. The months were renamed after harvest and weather. Holy days were turned into numbers. Sunday became a workday. Saints were forgotten. Their relics were smashed. The past was declared an enemy of the future. The revolutionaries did not just want to rule men. They wanted to rule time.


In Paris, the September Massacres bathed the streets in holy blood. Over two hundred priests were butchered in one week. Some were hacked to death with sabers. Others were disemboweled in front of jeering mobs. Some were thrown from prison windows. Their only crime was fidelity to Rome and refusal to swear to a godless regime. The martyrs of Paris died without bitterness, their last words often prayers.


Even the churches were not spared. Notre Dame was desecrated and renamed the Temple of Reason. Prostitutes dressed as goddesses danced on altars. The incense of prayer was replaced with the stench of mockery. Saints were torn from niches. A new year was proclaimed. Faith was abolished by decree. The revolution sought not to reform Christianity. It sought to erase it from memory.


Robespierre, unwilling to leave a spiritual vacuum, created the Cult of the Supreme Being. He played a high priest on a man-made mountain. He wore white robes and gave homilies to a crowd that no longer believed. His god was an abstraction. His doctrine was terror. He sent his comrades to the guillotine one by one. His altar was a scaffold.


At the center of the storm stood the execution of King Louis XVI. Like Charles I before him, Louis was not simply deposed. He was tried, mocked, and murdered. His wife followed. His son died in a dungeon. His bloodline was wiped out. His burial site was unknown. The sacred monarchy of France, stretching back a thousand years to Clovis, was ended by a mob that understood neither history nor holiness. It was not a revolution. It was a ritual murder.

The lands once held by the Church and aristocracy were seized and auctioned off to the very class that had orchestrated the revolution. Merchants who once counted coins in shops now purchased estates and titles. They became the new lords, but with no sense of duty or honor. Where a noble once ruled by sword and sacrament, the banker now ruled by credit and contract. The revolution did not bring equality. It delivered a monopoly. The poor remained in chains. The saints were dead. The only victors were those who funded the chaos.

Napoleon would rise from the ashes and restore order, but not the old faith. He crowned himself emperor. He signed concordats with the Vatican but treated the Church as a tool of the state. He ruled not as heir of Christendom, but as the general of revolution. He marched with glory, not grace. He carried law in one hand and war in the other.


The French Revolution was not a beacon. It was a bonfire. It burned the king. It burned the Church. It burned the soul of a nation. It gave birth to the modern secular republic, where faith is privatized, tradition is mocked, and man is measured only by productivity and paper. The guillotine may be gone, but its spirit lives on in bureaucracy, in debt, in cultural amnesia, and in every law that puts man above God.


And in the ruins of the throne and altar, the merchant stood smiling. The king was dead. The Church was broken. The people were conquered. And all of it was done in their name.

Before the United States was born, its foundations were already divided. The Northern colonies, especially those of New England, were settled by Low Church Protestants, merchants, tradesmen, and Puritan dissenters. They came seeking religious autonomy, yes, but they also brought with them a commercial ethic, a worldview that prized thrift, contract, and commerce. They built tight, efficient towns. They organized congregational churches with democratic structure. Their spirit was industrious, austere, and skeptical of hierarchy.

By contrast, the South was settled by men of another world. Through Jamestown and Virginia, there came the sons of Cavaliers, the supporters of Charles I and the royalist cause who had been defeated in the English Civil War. These men brought with them the vision of Christian kingship, chivalric duty, and hierarchical order. They carved estates out of wilderness. They established churches that mirrored the liturgies of old England. They did not seek equality. They sought honor. In this clash of peoples, two civilizations were seeded on American soil. One believed in the power of the market. The other in the sanctity of the land.

In the antebellum South, that Cavalier spirit reached its final flowering. The Southern gentleman was not a capitalist. He was a patriarch. He ruled his estate not for quarterly profit but as a steward of a bloodline, a culture, and a moral order. The South had barons, not bankers. It had chapels, not stock exchanges. Its highest values were duty, dignity, and rootedness. The cavalier was the American Jacobite. He wore linen instead of tartan, but he fought for the same thing: God, land, and memory.


The culture of the South was explicitly Christian. Psalms were sung on porches. The Bible was read at dawn. The Sabbath was kept sacred. Education emphasized Greek, Latin, and Scripture. Its leaders quoted Cicero and Calvin. Its lawyers referenced Blackstone and the Pentateuch. It was not a utopia, but it was a remnant of Christendom.


To the North, this was anachronism. To the merchant class, it was obstruction. New York, Boston, and Philadelphia had already surrendered to the new order. Cities grew fat with banking houses, factories, and railroads. Men like Jay Cooke turned war into business. Cooke, a Philadelphia financier, sold hundreds of millions in Union war bonds. He funded regiments and manipulated newspapers. He made patriotism profitable. For men like him, the South was not a fellow American culture. It was a business opportunity to be subdued.

The Civil War was not merely a clash of regional interests. It was a metaphysical war. It was the final confrontation between the Christian aristocracy and the industrial republic. Between the worldview of the sacred and the worldview of the efficient. The South believed that the soil was holy. The North believed it was the capital. The South believed in God. The North believed in production.


Abraham Lincoln became the Cromwell of the American Republic. Like Caesar, he centralized power in the name of the people. He suspended habeas corpus. He imprisoned dissenters. He ruled by executive decree. The presidency became imperial. The Constitution became optional. The war was waged not to restore a republic, but to create a new state: unified, centralized, industrial, and managerial.


The South fought as the last outpost of the old world. Its soldiers knelt in prayer before battle. Its generals carried Bibles beside their swords. Robert E. Lee was not merely a tactician. He was a relic of a world that honored virtue over victory. The South remembered. It remembered that man was more than labor. That land was more than resource. That the cross was higher than the coin.


But the memory was not enough. The North had factories. It had capital. It had shipping lanes and immigrant labor. It had railroads and foreign loans. British and European bankers, including Rothschild agents in London, viewed a fractured America as a risk to global trade. They favored the Union. Not because they loved the North, but because they trusted its vision. A strong, centralized, industrial republic could serve their interests. An agrarian, Christian, semi-feudal South could not.


And so the South was broken. Sherman marched not to defeat armies, but to annihilate a culture. He burned churches. He torched libraries. He salted the soil. It was not total war. It was cultural liquidation. After Appomattox, the South did not simply surrender. It was dismantled.


Appomattox was not just a battlefield. It was a tombstone. The surrender of Lee to Grant marked the end of Christian America. The flag still flew. The Constitution still stood. But the soul had changed. The covenant was broken. The republic was gone. What remained was a managerial empire governed by credit and bureaucracy.


Reconstruction was not reconstruction. It was colonization. Carpetbaggers arrived to buy up land at auction. Banks issued predatory loans. Railroads were built not to bind communities, but to extract wealth. Local laws were rewritten. Schools taught federal civics. Churches were subordinated to state regulation. The planter became a tenant. The patriarch became a criminal. The preacher became a clerk.


Southern institutions were systematically dismantled. Publishing houses were shuttered. Classical curricula were erased. Law schools stopped teaching Blackstone and began training bureaucrats. The very language of the South—its accents, idioms, and proverbs—were mocked and censored. The South was not merely defeated. It was reconstructed to forget itself.


The shift was total. Governance moved from moral authority to managerial control. Washington no longer represented a compact of sovereign states under God. It became a hub of statistical manipulation and fiscal calculation. The new ruling class did not preach the Gospel. I audited it. The merchant class, having triumphed in Europe, now ruled America.

And yet, even in ruin, the South remembered. In its old churches and decaying plantations, in its stubborn songs and hidden chapels, there remained a whisper of what was lost. The memory of altar and hearth. Of kings and creeds. Of cavalry and cathedral. It was the last stand of Christian aristocracy. The last witness of a world not governed by gold.


The modern world has tried to erase it. But still, it lingers. Not as nostalgia. As a warning.

After the smoke cleared at Appomattox, the world belonged to the merchant. The last true resistance of Christian aristocracy had been crushed. The Southern plantation class was gone. The Jacobite memory was dead. The European thrones were paralyzed, dethroned, or rendered symbolic. In the vacuum stepped a new ruling caste. Not of sword and sacrament, but of ledgers, loans, and legalese. The merchant banker became king.


The nineteenth century was not the age of progress. It was the age of possession. The old kingdoms of Christendom were broken not by invasion, but by balance sheets. No armies marched across the Alps to install this new empire. It was installed by central banks, bond markets, and the managed collapse of tradition. Sovereignty was no longer measured in banners or borders. It was measured in debt.


The banker no longer whispered behind the throne. He replaced it. With the founding of national central banks across Europe, political power shifted irrevocably. The king had once been crowned by God. Now he borrowed from London. The pope had once interpreted divine law. Now bureaucrats interpreted actuarial tables. Laws that had once upheld honor and fealty were rewritten to uphold liquidity and tax receipts. The merchant replaced the monarch. The economist replaced the priest.


This was not mere economics. It was a conquest. The Christian order had once forbidden usury. It had exalted the family, the guild, the village, and the altar. It had taught that man was a steward, bound by duty and conscience. But the new order taught man to chase profit, to uproot his family for a wage, and to measure worth by numbers. In the Christian economy, land was sacred, debt was a danger, and rest was a commandment. In the merchant economy, land was inventory, debt was leverage, and rest was laziness.


What rose to replace Christendom was not just secular. It was a counterfeit religion. The merchant became a false priest. His exchange became the temple. His rituals were compound interest and fiat money. His prophecy was quarterly earnings. His sacraments were war bonds and stock offerings. He could not offer forgiveness, only refinancing. He did not teach salvation, only speculation. And unlike the ancient pagans, he did not build temples, or carve statues, or worship courage. Even the old gods required valor. The new ones required only submission to the market.


In ancient Greece and Rome, the pagan priest honored order, cosmos, and courage. He bowed to something higher than man. He stood beneath the stars. The merchant banker bows to no one. He worships volatility. He profits from instability. He feeds off the destruction of memory. Paganism, for all its error, still recognized glory. The modern financier recognizes only credit.


And yet the world obeyed him. Politicians became his frontmen. Industrialists became his tools. Newspapers became his choir. The banker-controlled policy through debt. He controlled sentiment through the press. He controlled war through bonds. And as revolutions swept Europe, he bankrolled them all. Not because he believed in their slogans, but because he understood that chaos feeds consolidation. The crown is costly. The contract is cheap.

Even the industrial barons, Carnegie, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, were subordinate. They were lords of steel and oil, but the banker owned the land they stood on. J.P. Morgan did not invent. He was absorbed. He bought out competitors. He crushed smallholders. He bailed out the U.S. Treasury in 1895 with gold from his vault, reminding the nation that the government was his client, not his master. Behind every factory was a financier. Behind every war was a creditor.


Globally, the merchant empire expanded without a single battalion. In India, village farmers were taxed to pay interest to London. In China, opium was traded for silver to balance accounts. In Africa, tribal kings were undermined by banks and corporate charters. In Latin America, governments were created, collapsed, and sold like bonds. The merchant had no loyalty but capital. His banner was not a lion or a cross. It was a ledger.


The Industrial Revolution, framed as progress, was in truth a social holocaust. Families were broken apart for factory schedules. Children were put into mines and mills. Entire villages emptied. Guilds were destroyed. Local knowledge was replaced by mechanical standardization. The craftsman was reduced to a cog. The farmer became a debtor. The family became a liability. Man, once viewed as made in God’s image, was now seen as an input.


The Church tried to resist, but it was infiltrated, suborned, and neutralized. Protestant churches were co-opted into state bureaucracies or reduced to private spiritual clubs. Catholic institutions were expropriated or modernized into irrelevance. Theological seminaries taught Darwin and Bentham instead of Aquinas and Augustine. Canon law was abandoned. Moral authority gave way to economic rationale. Usury, once ranked among the gravest sins, was now taught as a skill.


And the people forgot. The banker did not march in uniform. He did not issue edicts from balconies. He issued credit from offices. He needed no throne. He had the stock exchange. The world bowed not in loyalty, but in debt.


The merchant empire did not merely challenge Christendom. It buried it. It replaced its rituals with transactions, its sacraments with securities, its saints with shareholders. The old gods, for all their flaws, demanded courage and sacrifice. The new gods demanded only your soul—and a monthly payment plan.


The Christian monarch once ruled beneath heaven. His crown was not merely a symbol of power, but of divine appointment. His authority extended from Scripture. His law bore the stamp of Christendom. When he ruled well, he brought harmony between the altar and the sword. When he ruled poorly, he answered to God and to history.


He has been replaced. Not by another king, but by a system. A labyrinth. A machine. This system calls itself democracy. But it is no true rule of the people. It is a managed apparatus that sells the illusion of control to the masses, while its levers are pulled by bankers, consultants, and bureaucrats. It is not liberty. It is containment.


Democracy did not rise from the soil of liberty. It was planted by the merchant class to replace monarchy with creditocracy. It was a revolution not of arms but of abstractions. In this new order, the people may vote, but only for candidates pre-approved by capital. They may speak, but only within permitted parameters. Their rulers no longer wear crowns. They wear credentials and hide behind polling data.


In France, the Revolution overthrew the throne and declared the people sovereign. But the people were swiftly betrayed. The men who funded the Jacobins were not peasant farmers. They were financiers who smelled blood in the water. They lent to both sides and watched the nation burn. Churches were desecrated. Priests were slaughtered. The cathedral gave way to the bank. The guillotine replaced the altar. In Italy, the unification movement seized Church lands and reduced the pope to a prisoner of the Vatican. The merchants had no interest in papal sovereignty. They wanted infrastructure, industry, and unencumbered markets. The sword was used, but the coin decided the outcome.


The new rulers declared that monarchy was obsolete and religion was regressive. But what they offered in return was not progress. It was reduced. Man was no longer a pilgrim journeying toward God. He was a producer and a consumer. His dignity was no longer based on his soul, but on his output. His rights no longer came from above, but from the consensus of managers.


The Christian economy had been built on moral limits. It forbade usury. It respected land, lineage, and labor. It tied economic activity to eternal truths. The new capitalist order rejected all limits. It sanctified the market. It deregulated the sacred. It declared that there were no permanent things—only permanent growth. In this system, man is not elevated. He is flattened. He is not led. He is processed. His value is not in his virtue, but in his purchasing power. He is no longer a citizen of a kingdom. He is a data point in a global spreadsheet.


The world has not entered a new age of freedom. It has entered a new paganism, but without the beauty or courage of the old. The pagans of antiquity honored strength, discipline, and cosmic order. They carved marble, composed epics, and bled for their gods. The new pagans produce nothing. They consume endlessly. They worship nothing but convenience. Their temples are shopping malls. Their liturgies are advertising jingles. Their gods are algorithms.

Capitalism, unmoored from Christian ethics, has become a religion of profanation. Its missionaries are global corporations. Its sacraments are subscriptions. Its revelation is the quarterly report. It claims to liberate, but it only accelerates dependence. It centralizes power. It uproots tradition. It sterilizes the family. It monetizes every inch of creation.


Democracy, once envisioned as a guardian of liberty, now functions as a mask for managerial rule. Elections are decided by money. Laws are written by lobbyists. The press is owned by investors. Bureaucrats cannot be removed. Policies cannot be reversed. The will of the people is an inconvenience to be managed, not a command to be obeyed.

Under this regime, even rebellion is permitted, so long as it is unthreatening and unorganized. The people are encouraged to protest, but only in ways that exhaust rather than transform. The rulers understand that fatigue is more effective than force.

The cost of this order is not merely political. It is metaphysical. The human soul, stripped of its destiny, now floats in nihilism. Once, man was a being made in the image of God, entrusted with dominion over the earth and called to holiness. Now he is told he is an accident, a consumer, a carbon emitter, a subject of bureaucratic welfare and digital surveillance.

The family disintegrates. The Church is silent. The nation is hollowed out. And still, the market demands more.


The final dream of the merchant is almost complete. A world in which every movement is tracked. Every purchase is recorded. Every dissent is flagged. A world where there are no kings, no heroes, no martyrs. Only managers, regulators, and endless compliance.

There are no chains, only terms of service. No executioners, only credit denials. No prisons, only safe zones. The entire world has become a shopping mall with armed guards. We were promised progress. We received a simulation.


The Christian monarch ruled as a father. The merchant regime rules as a machine. One governed for the soul. The other calculates for the bottom line. The old world honored the cross. The new one worships the spreadsheet. This is not freedom. This is exile from all that made man whole.


Three centuries ago, the world still remembered the crown and the altar. The Christian monarch reigned beneath heaven, answerable to God and steward of his people. Nobility preserved order. The Church sanctified time and place. Families were rooted, and land was not yet numbers on a screen. The world was flawed, but it had meaning. The king bowed to Christ. The people bowed with him.


Then the revolution began. It did not begin in one place, and it did not end with one victory. It swept from England to France, from the continent to the colonies. From Cromwell to Robespierre, from the Committee of Public Safety to Lincoln’s iron government, from Lenin’s commissars to the global financiers of today, the pattern remains. The monarch fell. The priest was silenced. The nobleman was exiled. The merchant rose. The banker smiled. The system changed its name, but not its purpose. Democracy became the disguise for debt. Freedom became the language of the marketplace.


This was no accident. This was no progress. It was a war. A cold, calculating war. A war against God’s order. A war against memory and meaning. A war waged not with cannon, but with credit. The merchant did not need to conquer. He needed only to lend. He needed only to convince the king to borrow, the church to invest, the people to consume.


And so we now live in his world. A world with no crown. No altar. No honor. A world where debt is sacred and faith is profane. A world where the father is mocked, the mother is overworked, and the child is sedated. The Church is silent. The nation is hollowed. The people are managed. This is not a civilization. It is a spreadsheet.


The collapse is not just political. It is ontological. The foundations of being itself are cracking. Man has forgotten who he is. He no longer sees himself as the image of God. He sees himself as a tool, a product, a problem. He does not labor for eternity. He works for rent. He does not build for his descendants. He leases his soul for an hourly wage. His home is temporary. His memory is digital. His hope is synthetic.


Yet not all is lost. Beneath the glass and steel, the stone still stands. Beneath the shopping malls and server farms, the ruins of the old world remain. The seed of the sacred king lies buried, waiting. The altar waits to be rebuilt. The White Tree is not dead. It waits in silence. The banner of Christ is not torn. It waits to be raised by the last good men.

This is not just history. This is the war of the ages. Moloch or Christ. Mammon or the Cross. There is no truce between the altar and the bank. No compromise between the kingdom of heaven and the marketplace of man. The kings of old died to protect the sacred. The merchants of today kill to protect the profitable.


There can be no restoration without sacrifice. It will not come through elections. It will not come through reforms. It will come through fire and faith. It will demand hierarchy, not equality. It will demand men who fear God more than they fear debt. It will demand women who build homes rather than platforms. It will demand fathers who provide and priests who preach. It will demand that Christ be king again.


The restoration must be total. Political, yes, but also liturgical. Economic, yes, but also familial. It must restore the rhythm of sacred time. It must restore the meaning of birth and death. It must restore the soil, the sword, and the psalm. The merchant’s empire can build nothing but walls and wires. The Christian kingdom builds altars, vineyards, and cathedrals.

The choice is now plain. Restoration or ruin. Sacred order or technocratic slavery. Christian kingship or corporate management. If we choose the Cross, we may yet be saved. If we cling to Mammon, we will die—not just as nations, but as men.


Let the cathedrals rise again. Let the king return. Let the altar blaze. Let the banners fly. The merchants may rule the world. But they cannot inspire it. They cannot sanctify it. And in the end, they cannot save it.


Only Christ can do that. And He will.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page